posted by
imaginarycircus at 07:01am on 13/04/2010
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's really weird when you can't sleep and you're worrying about the ending of your novel and you suddenly realize the answer to your problem is the meat of a paper you wrote your freshman year in college about The Iliad Odyssey, and specifically about how cunning Athena really is. Zeus may have had lightning bolts, but she could control people to a very fine degree.
Case in point. Telemachus. She didn't want Odysseus to return home to a son who wasn't worthy of him so she took the form of Nestor and horrified him with stories about Orestes. Orestes killed his mother, Clytemnestra, because she killed his father, Agamemnon, when he returned home from the war. (He killed Iphegenia for wind when he first set off for Troy and the whole mess was really because there was a curse on the house of Atreide because one of them fed their son to the Gods) but whatever) Athena knew exactly how to push Telemachus' buttons so that he was pissed about all his mother's suitors, but afraid to do too much lest he have to kill his mother to protect his honor.
Hello clarity. Please be here when I sit down to work later today, hopefully after I've had a bit more sleep. Bleh. Maybe I should just get an early start...
eta: David woke up now that it is 7 am and he said, "Why are you wondering around the house at 7 with no pants on reading The Odyssey?"
Well, why not? :/
Case in point. Telemachus. She didn't want Odysseus to return home to a son who wasn't worthy of him so she took the form of Nestor and horrified him with stories about Orestes. Orestes killed his mother, Clytemnestra, because she killed his father, Agamemnon, when he returned home from the war. (He killed Iphegenia for wind when he first set off for Troy and the whole mess was really because there was a curse on the house of Atreide because one of them fed their son to the Gods) but whatever) Athena knew exactly how to push Telemachus' buttons so that he was pissed about all his mother's suitors, but afraid to do too much lest he have to kill his mother to protect his honor.
Hello clarity. Please be here when I sit down to work later today, hopefully after I've had a bit more sleep. Bleh. Maybe I should just get an early start...
eta: David woke up now that it is 7 am and he said, "Why are you wondering around the house at 7 with no pants on reading The Odyssey?"
Well, why not? :/
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...you know, that is NOT the strangest Greek-related question I have ever heard. I think that says something.
Also, the whole Atreides thing? Proof of why you do not taunt the gods. Vindictive bastids, all of them, and creative, too.
(no subject)
Oh, it's not the strangest Greek related question I've ever heard either, but I was a Johnnie.
(no subject)
Heh, classical Greek major here. Specialty in magic. I had some...odd...questions asked of me.
(no subject)
Magic? I'm so curious! Magic what?
(no subject)
One of the guys in my grad seminar was a Johnnie. I envied him so much...such original-language goodness!
Magic, well, everything. I've got dual majors - classics/classical Greek and anthropology, specialty ethnoarchaeology subspecialty Aztecs/magic/religion.
My primary concentration in Greek magic was on parallel uses of magic - basically, what the purpose of magic was in an ostensibly rational culture. Turns out, magic was a parallel practice - it worked as a complementary device next to religion, law, and science, not a replacement for them. The most intriguing case of this is in law, really. There's an entire parallel system of detection, prosecution, and punishment that revolves around magical practice.
(no subject)
I loved thinking about that when we were reading The Bacchae and other tragedies that pit science against magic. That's one reason I find alchemy's obsession with astrology fascinating--and that is one of the key underpinnings of my novel.
(no subject)
See, that's the neat thing about later magical practice, too, especially in the Age of Enlightenment - science was just coming into vogue, and alchemy existed as a parallel practice or counterpart to it, not a replacement. That's where all the confusion about poor Dr. John Dee comes in...
(no subject)
As a seduction technique.
...what? It worked!
(no subject)
YOU WIN!
(no subject)
Well, why not? :/
<3
(no subject)
How are you feeling?
(no subject)
So, so much better. I napped for a while, and I've just been mainlining fluids and nibbling on matzoh. So relieved. TY for asking! *hugs*
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Well, why not?
Exactly. That's, like, the optimum moment.
(no subject)
(no subject)
If it knocked me out with sheer boring, awesome! Sleep!
If it kept me engaged, awesome! More knowledge!
It's a win-win.
(no subject)